2 September 2011

Dear Dom,

Enjoying your shows as fill-in for Lou during the last few days, and listening to the interview with Rep. Peter King (R-NY) Chairman, Homeland Security Committee, wherein you and Rep. King agreed it would be wise and helpful if Muslim Imams or other clerics would be present, and even included in the ceremonies for Memorial Services on the 10th Anniversary of 9/11, I would offer the following for consideration.

How ignorant and utterly stupid you both must be! IF either of you don't know by now that Muslims are avowed enemies of this country and in fact strive to annihilate Western Civilizations, you need to have your heads examined.

Try these statistics out for starters:

Since the inception and rise to prominence of Muhammadan Islam in the early 7th Century A.D. the number of deaths and vitimizations attributed to Jihad may be summed up as follows:

• Africa - 120 million
• Christians - 60 million
• Hindus - 80 million
• Buddhists - 10 million
• Jews (less than 1 million)



• Total: 270 million

• 97% or more deadly terrorist attacks around the world in this century are attributed to Muhammadan Muslims and jihad.

• 100% of violent, assault rapes against non-Muslim females in Sweden and Norway in this decade, according to police reports, are committed by Muslim Males.

Obama said at the latest White House Iftar dinner:

"Like so many faiths, Islam has always been part of our American family, and Muslim Americans have long contributed to the strength and character of our country, in all walks of life."

These words have no basis in fact. Islam is not part of our civilization because its foundational principles are opposite to ours. Our civilization is built on the foundation of critical thought (how we think) and the Golden Rule (ethics). Islam is built on submission (authoritative thought) and ethical dualism.

And people say that Islam just needs to be reformed. Good luck on dealing the authoritative rules of thought and reform. It is not that you are wrong, you are dead wrong. Want more examples of authoritative thought? Try Salman Rushdie, the author of the Satanic Verses, a novel. Islam’s reaction to the novel was a death fatwa. When the Mohammed cartoons were published, people died in riots.

So far in America what happens if you differ with Establishment thought about Islam, you are called names, such as bigot or hater, and insulted as a punishment. However, the Establishment keeps flirting with the expanded versions of hate speech being criminalized.  Hate speech is speech that the Establishment doesn’t like.

Critical thought does not deal with punishment, just cause and effect along with Aristotelian logic.  Nor do insults and threats play a part in critical thought.  If you lose an argument under the rules of critical thought, you have had a learning experience, not a life threatening experience.

To sum it all up: our civilization is based on the principles of the Golden Rule and critical thought. Islam is based on dualistic ethics and authoritative thought. There is no compromise between the opposites of the Golden Rule and dualistic ethics. There is no half-way between authoritative thought and critical thought. Islam’s principle of submission means that only active resistance can let us survive. Islam is not a religion of choice, and there is no allowance for modern interpretation, moderation, introspection or compromise with infidels (non-believers) in the doctrines posited by its false prophet, Muhammad, the perfect human.

There is no gray separating the black and white on this issue. There is no such thing as "radical" vs. "moderate" or "peaceful" Islam. It is simply not viewed by Muslims as a real concept. Any Muslim who refuses to embrace the Shari'a is classified as apostate, and his / her fate is annihilation by force. This is their creed and sacred doctrine, posited by the false prophet, Muhammad through the writings of Qur'an, Sira and Hadiths, the sacred trilogy of documents which comprise the ethos and doctrines of this diabolical, cult-belief system. Islam is NOT an equivalent to any religion on earth. It does not accept or respect any man-made laws, natural laws, Biblical laws, common law or Constitutional laws, because it would be against the supreme laws of Shari'a and the false Moon god Allah.

We have a 1400 year history of the interaction between Islam and Kafir nations. The data matches the theory. Centuries after Islam enters the culture the host culture is annihilated--see Turkey. There is no compatibility between Islam and us. Islam is not now, nor can it ever be, a part of our civilization. It is the final goal of Islam to annihilate all Kafir civilizations. Its first stage of--we are just like you, only different—should be seen for what it is. No amount of preaching by apologists can change Islam’s political doctrine and history.

YOU may think we are not fighting Muslims, but you are dead wrong! How many examples does one have to ignore before he can make such an imbecilic, ignominious statement as that?

It is clear to all who know the raw facts about Islam, you and Peter King are clueless.

Have it your way, but don't expect anything to improve until we eliminate this cancer from our society and ban all traces of Muslims / Islamists from our schools, neighborhood mosques and government.

Sincerely,

Robert William Butler Jr

Houston, TX 77086

Phone: (281) 973-6863

Fax: (901) 234-9961

"Self-righteousness does not aid change, it merely lets us and others off the hook." - Jonathan Bartley, Environmentalist